ILC-CEO Talks to The Economist on Ageism & the Election
Posted by: Anti-Ageism Task ForceSunday, August 24, 2008 — In our last post, we polled readers on how much of a factor McCain's age is in the upcoming Presidential election. While most people believed age was not as important as function, others felt that, while age wasn't everything, it was a factor.
Taking the issue to task, The Economist recently sat down with the ILC's President & CEO Dr. Robert Butler, interviewing him for their Democracy in America blog. The magazine wanted to know — in “very real medical terms” — how McCain’s age might affect his presidency and how much ageism is a factor in this election.
Butler responded that he has not personally noticed anything in McCain’s behavior that is symptomatic of aging. On the contrary, Butler said, McCain seems remarkably energetic. However, he noted, if McCain were to say something incoherent, fuzzy, or take a long time to answer, it would be very quickly judged, and not only by younger people, but by older people, too.
Older people, Butler reminded, can sometimes be extremely ageist — a projection of their own fears of becoming dependent and sick.
Butler did concede that McCain’s melanoma was certainly a symptom of his age and something to be followed, and that, statisfically as we get older, we are simply more vultnerable to disease and death.
Butler also reinforced the idea put forth in his new book The Longevity Revolution, that the elderly generally don't vote as a block, and don't recognize their own interests the way other groups do.
Listen to the full 10-minute audio interview, including Dr. Butler's thoughts on older people and the internet, social security, and more.
Back
Related Links: The Economist Interview, Download our report: Ageism in America
Wisdom & Judgment VS. Experience
By Unknown on Oct 10 2008 at 11:24 PM
In his interview with the Economist, Dr. Butler said he thinks people can have lots of experience but might not develop good judgment or wisdom while a ten-year-old who has very little experience can be quite wise. His comment really struck me and provoked me to define what I think being wise is all about.
I think wisdom involves seeing the whole pattern of a problem including a variety of causes and the possible effects of different solutions. It is being still and allowing the puzzle to be observed through the inner self, so that judgment, when it comes, is based on awareness of the movement of possibility both past and future.
Often, the wise are unconscious of these workings but still depend on them for their words of advice and direction. It is a gift to experience the movement of truth within oneself and to make choice with certainty as a result.
There, I've said it. I feel better.
Gretchen